data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d210/5d2106f36c97a65a51fc61ce4597d22582936ab4" alt=""
Artist Robert Irwin designed the landscape for Beacon and though I like it enough, I'm disappointed that commissioning Irwin infers that an artist can take on a landscape design interchangeably with a landscape architect. Now, in all fairness, Irwin also did most of the planning for the gallery spaces themselves and as I said, they are extraordinary. But the landscape - to me - doesn't offer any revelations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7f32/c7f329ef645c7d4db37b838c8b092fb379b4421f" alt=""
Above you have the aerial hedges of Carpinus betulus. Second to birches, I'd say that straight rows of columnar architectural hornbeams are the go-to design gesture for museums. It's a touch cliche, really. I understand that in an urban environment the tall narrow canopies of Betulaceae-family trees make sense, but with so much opportunity on this site, it's disappointing that no risks were taken. Particularly when you consider that risk - even indulgence - can be concomitant with works of contemporary art. Why none of that expressiveness in the landscape?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0282/d02821972fe2cc164b6cca0a1d6b66bddb16aa81" alt=""
I did like the detailing - the raised decks on corten steel refer to the Serra pieces inside and also protect the root zones of trees. Though I think I would have tried to come up with some more elegant way to hide the concrete footings (see image below). But at least they are not sonotubes -- nothing is more annoying than seeing the end of a sonotube peaking out of the ground, with the cardboard wrapping slowly peeling away.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbdb0/fbdb04aabdc1dc083ac9d1d4096a18ed948d97cb" alt=""
The mitered pieces of decking were subtly elegant details as well. Though I wish we would see more use of composite wood for its environmental benefits.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dcf7/7dcf7f7435e162c7693d5cd72caa121d8de6f70a" alt=""
The front lawn entrance changes from lawn to concrete and then to asphalt with the use of turf blocks - concrete honeycombs which allow turf to grow in the voids while (presumably) allowing a solid enough surface for firetruck parking and other heavy vehicular traffic (like cranes that will install large pieces of artwork).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f45f4/f45f479f842f206c7eed67b01248aed6f597b264" alt=""
Of course, that's my practical assumption as to why the turf block was used. I did read a review of the space at this link which interpreted the landscape as a "front garden, with concrete diamonds instead of open lawns. Tufts of grass peek through holes in the grid, as if desperate to escape the symmetry." Right.